Sunday, May 11, 2008

Textbook: Chapter 8

1. During World War II women took on new jobs to help with the labor force, but they were stereotyped even so. They took on these new roles in the workforce and proved themselves they were able to do work like men. Women began working in factories as welders and mechanics since the men that normally did these jobs were off in combat. Women were involved in military organizations and many were recruited to them. Women involved themselves in organizations such as the Women's Army Corps and Women's Airforce Service Pilots. Women, however, were not allowed to fight in actual combat, even though they were allowed to make the tools the men in combat were using. Women were stereotyped because, even though they were in the work place, most of their jobs were domestic. They worked as clerks and nurses, jobs that men were not often found in. Publicizing these jobs made women look less masculine in their war efforts.

2. Many things resulted in the wake of World War II. For instance, many young couples were marrying because no one knew if their loved one would be coming home or not. After the war, these couples began families and a rise in birth rates took place. A rise in deaths also took place for many men did not come home from the war. Since so many men were off fighting, women took their places in the work force and found themselves a new sense of independence. Many women continued working even after the war ended, continuing their independence. After the war women and their families began to expand and grow and women began a rein of new found independence.

Source Interpretation

1.Women's work opportunities were not limited because of their gender. Women were really needed during this time since so many men were away. They were needed so badly that the government enticed the women with propaganda. Women were able to make the same amount as men had been making, but women would need to work just as hard as the men did. That included around the clock shifts and graveyard shifts.

2. The intended audience is the men. Men in the factories and away at war were unsure about getting their jobs back when they returned. Women were not happy with the way they had to work and the conditions they had to work under. They hoped that the men would return soon and take their jobs back so that they could go back to housework. They admitted that the job was difficult and rather be at home.

3. Women were unhappy with their work. They thought their work was to difficult for them. They were happy to do the work, but were concerned with the conditions. They were tired from the graveyard shifts and found it difficult to sleep during the day in the hot city in their one bedroom apartment that they might share with three other girls. At the end of their shifts their bodies ached and their hands were sore from all the physical labor they were doing in order to receive the same wages as men

4. Women were able to keep their femininity in many ways, even though they worked men's jobs on the assembly lines. Women wore nail polish and probably make up to work as well. While at home they cooked meals and cleaned dishes. Women also kept up with conversation with each other. They most likely talked about the latest gossip and news.

5. Many women kept their jobs in the factories, but many women went in different paths. When the soldiers returned from the war, many of them married their girlfriends that had been holding down the labor fort. Those women returned to their domesticated lifestyles of children, cleaning and cooking in the home. They did not enjoy the work on the assembly lines and were happy to return to the home. But many women were not as luck as the ones whose loved ones come home. Many men did not return from the war and this devastated many women.

5 comments:

elias said...

Elias-R#1
Your blog really shows that you had a great understanding of the chapter. You were able to show how women worked hard in their jobs and were still stereotyped. I do not understand why the United States decided to start programs for women such as the Women’s Army Corps if they would have no use for them in actual combat. We have really come a long way when we look at today’s era and see many women fighting in Iraq or women who are involved in law enforcement. Women were probably recruited to the Women’s Army Corps during World War II in order to show other women in the United States that it was important for them to take a part in United States services and therefore influenced many of these women to join the workforce. This could be seen as a form of propaganda. The war has influenced future generations of women a great deal because their independence during the war showed men how capable women really are when they are faced with a challenge. Many do not realize the importance of women during World War II until they actually read the articles of how these women participated. We usually focus on the combat that took place but it was the women that kept the United States and its economy on its feet.

annieg123 said...

Annie’s Response #1 to Tyler:
During World War II women were in need. Women were introduced to the labor force. Like you said they, “took on these new roles in the workforce and proved themselves they were able to do work like men.” Even though, they were given jobs they still played women roles, they also kept their feminine sides. Some, were taking advantage of their independence and joining hard labor jobs that men used to have. Some were complaining that these jobs were not fit for them and they wanted to return home and go on with their daily domestic work as before. Many changes occurred within families during and after the World War II. Many couples were getting married, in hope that their husbands would return home. Women joined the work force during World War II and took on great responsibilities. After, World War II many couples reunited and birth rates were on a rise. Likewise, there was a high death rate for those men who fought and hand not survived to make it back home. During the time of war women were unsure of their working conditions, I’m glad you were able to point that out in the source interpretation. Even though, men had finally found confidence in women in accomplishing the same jobs as them. Some women were just finding these jobs to difficult to accomplish. Women would still keep their feminine sides on hard jobs.

EOL said...

Response #1, Erica

Hi Tyler, great job with you interpretations of the readings. I always find something new that I had not noticed when I read someone else’s blog. Anyway, I just wanted to comment that I noticed that a few people thought that the article was mostly geared towards men; I have a slightly different opinion. I think the article was not only geared towards making men feel more comfortable with women in the workplace but I think it was also meant to calm the fears of the general public and in a sly way hint to women that they are to want to return to their domestic duties. Everyone seemed to worry that working women were losing their femininity and want of being wives and mothers, men worried about returning home and not being able to find jobs, and women worried about losing their jobs with the return of men. I think the article addressed all these fears. It assured people that women were still behaving as young women should, it assured men that most women were willing to give up their positions as the men returned and that women were looking forward to becoming wives and mothers, and with the mention of hard work and harsh living conditions, I think this was to discourage women or show reasons why women would not want to continue working after the men returned.

Gogzilla said...

George R#1
Hi Tyler, once again you have managed to write a great blog. I particularly enjoyed reading your Source Interpretation because overall that is where the real heart of the matter lies. That section I feel is more dedicated to opening up discussion. On most parts of your blog I agreed with you, like on question 1 of the S.I. which asked if women's work opportunities were limited due to their gender. However, when speaking about the intended audience of the article, I felt like it wasn't just geared towards men, but the women as well because of the emphasis on women's behavior and outlook on their jobs in the factories. Also I can't say I'm positive, but I don't think that women were necessarily unhappy with their work. Most likely they weren't overjoyed to do it, but I got the feeling that they knew they had to and thats what drove them to tolerate it. Good job on providing some interesting views on the subject at hand. Great blog.

Anonymous said...

Tyler Response to Everyone!

Hey guys! Thanks for your responses! I wish this counted at my 2nd response, but I'm out of luck I think. A couple of you said that you disagreed that the article was only intended for men. I also agree with you. When I first started reading the document I thought it was to pursuade and ensure women that even thought the work was tough, the women enjoyed working for the common good of the nations. So I do agree that this document wasn't only intended for men. But in the end of the document it notions toward the fact that women were happy to return to domesticated lifestyles and ensured men of their place in the work force. Thanks for your responses everyone!